Abstract
Aim in this study, namely to study and analyze the existence of judges in the trial of narcotics offenders? In this study the authors used a sociological juridical method with a descriptive analytical research specification. The data used for this research are primary and secondary data. Based on the results of the research with the conclusion that the existence of judges in the implementation of the narcotics crime court based on the analysis in case Number 70 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN Mgg, it is not wrong to be categorized as someone who thinks scientifically. As seen in the decision making, where the judge does not solely work to make and determine decisions by observing and completely applying abstract legal rules, but judges always see the problems faced in a broader context. Judging from the judge's consideration in seeing the case of the defendant Carolina Umarela by looking at things that were burdensome.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.