Abstract
The article presents the issue of recusal of a judge as one of the guarantees of a fair criminal trial. The author presented in the first part of the text the question of recusal of a judge under Articles 40 and 41 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in historical perspective. Looking from that perspective, she analysed the fundamental context of recusal of a judge in view of procedural principles, namely the impartiality and independence of the judge, and the function of judge’s recusal. Finally, she presented conclusions for the currently applicable law and proposals for the law as it should stand and the consequences of admitting a judge affected by recusal under Article 40(1) or (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
