Judaism and the Gentiles: Jewish Patterns of Universalism (to 135 CE) (review)

Abstract

Reviewed by: Judaism and the Gentiles: Jewish Patterns of Universalism (to 135 CE) J. Albert Harrill Judaism and the Gentiles: Jewish Patterns of Universalism (to 135 CE), by Terence L. Donaldson. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press, 2007. 563 pp. $59.95. This sourcebook identifies and documents the various patterns of Jewish universalism, from the Hellenistic era to the Bar Cochba revolt. The presentation follows that of Menahem Stern, Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism (Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1974), in which the author aims to deliver the principal texts ad seriatim, each receiving a full discussion. After an introduction (Chapter 1), Part I presents the texts and commentary, organized by corpora of sources (pp. 15–466). Part II synthesizes the findings (pp. 467–513), a good place for readers to start. Donaldson assigns each text to one of four discrete patterns of Jewish universalism: (1) sympathization, texts describing Gentiles engaged in Jewish activity and association; (2) conversion, texts describing Gentiles becoming proselytes; (3) ethical monotheism, texts aligning Greek philosophy and Torah religion as parallel paths to a universal God; and (4) eschatological participation, texts describing Gentiles as beneficiaries in the end-time redemption of Israel (see précis on pp. 10–11). Inclusion in one or other of these categories does not mean that the text provides positive evidence for the pattern (p. 539). In many cases, Donaldson has to argue by context that the particular pattern is implicit in the text. To do so, he applies a methodology appropriated from the study of the historical Jesus, called the criterion of multiple attestation: "Where a similar viewpoint is attested in multiple sources—especially if those sources differ in form and provenance—it is appropriate to conclude that the viewpoint is present—at least in latent form—in the tradition. That is, we are justified to think that it was an inherent option, something that could exist between and beyond the points on the graph for which we have evidence" (p. 507). Most of the texts from Scripture, the Septuagint, and Apocrypha (Chapter 2) fall under the sympathization and conversion categories. The important biblical book is Daniel, which describes the possibility that a Gentile king could venerate God and even be prepared to "become a Jew" (p. 30). Texts from the Pseudepigrapha (Chapter 3) are a mixed bag. Unsurprisingly, apocalyptic [End Page 181] literature (1 Enoch, Sibylline Oracles, Psalms of Solomon, 2 Baruch) falls mostly under the category of eschatological participation, while apologetic works tend to display sympathization, conversion, and ethical monotheism (Letter of Aristeas, Joseph and Aseneth). Here, Donaldson's expanded definition of universalism to include proselytism puts him at odds with scholars such as John J. Collins (p. 103). This definition becomes problematic in his analysis of the Qumran material (chapter 4). It is not true that Gentile slaves "appear to have joined their masters as full members of the covenant and thus can be described as proselytes" (p. 206, see also p. 454). Catherine Hezser, Jewish Slavery in Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), has shown that the practice of circumcision, typically forced, and ritual immersion did not "make" Gentile slaves "proselytes" but merely purified them to perform their necessary domestic work. Philo of Alexandria's writings (Chapter 5) fall mostly under the conversion category. Philo envisioned "the hallmark of proselytism" to be "ethical monotheism; the proselyte is one who, with Abraham, has exchanged the worship of the many for the worship of the One" (p. 215). "But at the same time," Donaldson writes, Philo "gives no indication whatsoever that one could arrive at this destination without remaining or becoming a part of the ethnos whose politeia is the law of Moses" (p. 256). Flavius Josephus (Chapter 6) provides evidence mostly for sympathization. Against Apion, for example, contains "probably the most unreserved—even exuberant—acclamation of Gentiles sympathizing in the whole Josephan corpus" (p. 355). Helpful is the author's analysis of so-called God-fearers (more on this below). Josephus's readers would have understood the term as a "reference to Gentile worshippers. This does not mean that the term is a technical one," however (p. 326). And Donaldson gives pride of...