Judaism & Christianity in the Age of Constantine: History, Messiah, Israel, and the Initial Confrontation (review)

Abstract

& Christianity in the Age of Constantine: History, Messiah, Israel, and the Initial Confrontation, by Jacob Neusner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007. 262 pp. $25.00. When Jacob Neusner's & Christianity in the Age of Constantine first appeared in 1987, it was on the cusp of newer scholarship that was postponing the decisive split between the two religions from the first century to the fourth. Following this trend, Neusner believed he had identified in the Age of Constantine a unique moment in the relationship between the two faiths, one in which Christians and Jews, both reacting to the changes effected by that emper or's conversion, for the first time confronted other over questions of history and identity. As a result of this confrontation, Judaism as we have known it was born (p. ix). In a series of chapters, Neusner compares his readings of the document familiarly known as the Jerusalem (Neusner prefers Talmud of the Land of Israel), which was probably completed during this period, with the writings of three contemporary Christian authors - Eusebius of Caesarea, the celebrated father of Church History; the Antiochene priest John Chrysostom, who subsequently became bishop of Constantinople; and Aphrahat, whose poetic homilies earned him the title ofthe Persian sage. As never before or since (until modern times), Neusner argued, these authors addressed the same questions and used the same methods and same texts, and did all of this in an atmosphere of civility and respect, each with dignity, in defense of the new faith (p. 152). This is a sweeping claim. Readers will immediately wonder why Justin's Dialogue with Trypho in the second century or Jerome's interactions with Jewish tutors in the fifth do not constitute similar confrontations, especially since, as Neusner is forced to admit, there is no evidence his authors were directly responding to other, or even aware of the arguments being put forth by the other side. The answer lies, in part, in the limited selection of texts Neusner considers. This book is parr of a trilogy that grew out of his study of Mishnaic and Talmudic texts, which do demonstrate the changed interest he discerns. Another reason is that he relies heavily on others for his judgment of Christian authors. Here, too, his selection of texts is limited. In the case of Eusebius, for instance, Neusner limits himself to the Chronicle and Church History - two works completed in whole or part before Constantine's accession - when two other works, the Praeparatio and Demonstratio Evangelica, would have provided much richer evidence of engagement with issues of Jewish history and identity, though hardly with the respect and civility that Neusner maintains characterized this period. …