JOURNAL SCAN

Abstract

Monotherapy with either aspirin or clopidogrel is recommended for long-term use after discontinuation of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The present study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel versus aspirin after 12-month DAPT for patients with ACS who underwent PCI in China.A 2-part model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel compared with aspirin. The short-term part was a decision tree that included health states such as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, MI and stroke, cardiovascular death, and death from other causes with a treatment horizon of 1 year (base case), 2 years or 3 years after 12-month DAPT. Major bleeding was included. The long-term (lifetime) part was a Markov model that included different health states such as MI, after MI, stroke, after stroke, and death. Drug acquisition cost and other direct medical costs were based on pricing records, literature, and expert panels. Clinical outcomes and utilities were based on literature. The model output included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs per patient. Both 1-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted.In the base–case scenario, the total costs of the treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin were ¥12,590 ($1849/€1590) and ¥10,642 ($1563/€1344), respectively; the total QALYs of the 2 patient populations were 9.7341 and 9.6894, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ¥43,593 ($6402/€5515) per QALY gained was lower than 3 times of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in China (¥161,940, $23,786/€20,449). Both 1-way sensitivity analysis and PSA confirmed the robustness of the results. PSA results indicated that clopidogrel was cost effective versus aspirin in 80.5% of the simulations, considering >3 times the GDP per capita as the threshold. Results in other scenarios (clopidogrel or aspirin for 2 or 3 years after 12-month DAPT) also indicated that clopidogrel was more cost effective than aspirin for patients with ACS after 12-month DAPT.Compared with aspirin monotherapy, clopidogrel monotherapy for 1 year after 12-month DAPT was cost effective for patients with ACS who underwent PCI in China. Furthermore, when the duration of clopidogrel the monotherapy extended up to 3 years, clopidogrel was still cost effective compared with aspirin. The study was limited by lack of high-quality efficacy data among the Chinese population.