Abstract
Generalizing prior work of P. W. Anderson and E. R. Huggins, we show that a "detailed Josephson-Anderson relation" holds for drag on a finite body held at rest in a classical incompressible fluid flowing with velocity ${\bf V}.$ The relation asserts an exact equality between the instantaneous power consumption by the drag, $-{\bf F}\cdot{\bf V},$ and the vorticity flux across the potential mass current, $-(1/2)\int dJ\int \epsilon_{ijk}\Sigma_{ij}\,d\ell_k.$ Here $\Sigma_{ij}$ is the flux in the $i$th coordinate direction of the conserved $j$th component of vorticity and the line-integrals over $\ell$ are taken along streamlines of the potential flow solution ${\bf u}_\phi=\nabla\phi$ of the ideal Euler equation, carrying mass flux $dJ=\rho\,{\bf u}_\phi\cdot d{\bf A}.$ The results generalize the theories of M. J. Lighthill for flow past a body and, in particular, the steady-state relation $(1/2)\epsilon_{ijk}\langle\Sigma_{jk}\rangle =\partial_i\langle h\rangle,$ where $h=p+(1/2)|{\bf u}|^2$ is the generalized enthalpy or total pressure, extends Lighthill's theory of vorticity generation at solid walls into the interior of the flow. We use these results to explain drag on the body in terms of vortex dynamics, unifying the theories for classical fluids and for quantum superfluids. The results offer a new solution to the "D'Alembert paradox" at infinite Reynolds numbers and imply the necessary conditions for turbulent drag reduction.
Highlights
The origin of the Josephson-Anderson relation lies in the work of Josephson on the tunneling of Cooper pairs through normal-superconductor-metal junctions and, in particular, his ac effect [1]
The importance of the Josephson-Anderson relation arises from the intimate connection it reveals between force balance and vortex motion
We present a new application of the classical Josephson-Anderson relation to flow past a finite solid body and to the problem of the origin of drag
Summary
The origin of the Josephson-Anderson relation lies in the work of Josephson on the tunneling of Cooper pairs through normal-superconductor-metal junctions and, in particular, his ac effect [1]. Our analysis demonstrates a deep similarity between the origin of drag in classical and quantum fluids, with the Josephson-Anderson relation providing the key unifying concept In both cases, this relation shows that drag and dissipation are associated with motion of vorticity relative to the background ideal potential flow solving Euler’s equation. The concluding section (Sec. V) of the paper discusses general implications and ramifications of the detailed Josephson-Anderson relation, on the d’Alembert paradox and the Onsager theory of turbulence (Sec. VA), on novel empirical investigations made possible into drag mechanisms (Sec. V B), and new theoretical questions raised for both classical and quantum fluid flows (Sec. V C). Two Appendixes present supplemental results, a self-contained derivation of Huggin’s detailed relation for channel flow (Appendix A) and a short proof of a relation between vortex momentum and impulse that we require in our derivations (Appendix B)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.