Abstract

We prove that any complex values z_1,ldots ,z_n can be approximated by the following integral shifts of the Riemann zeta-function zeta (s+id_1tau ),ldots ,zeta (s+id_ntau ) for infinitely many tau , provided d_1,ldots ,d_nin {mathbb {Q}} are distinct and positive, and s is a fixed complex number lying in the right open half of the critical strip.

Highlights

  • In the 80’s of the last century Bagchi observed that the classical Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the fact that for every ε > 0 and every compact set K ⊂ D := {s ∈ C : 1/2 < Re(s) < 1} with connected complement we have lim inf 1 meas τ ∈ [0, T ] : max |ζ(s + iτ ) − ζ(s)| < ε > 0, (1)

  • Let us note that in the language of topological dynamics Inequality (1) says that the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the strong recurrence of the Riemann zeta-function

  • One implication in Bagchi’s observation is an immediate consequence of the so-called universality theorem due to Voronin [17], which is a generalization of the work of Bohr and his collaborators on denseness theorems in C of values of the Riemann zeta-function and states that for any non-vanishing and continuous function f (s) on K, analytic in the interior of K, and every ε > 0, we have lim inf 1 meas τ ∈ [0, T ] : max |ζ(s + iτ ) − f (s)| < ε > 0

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the 80’s of the last century Bagchi (see [1,2]) observed that the classical Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the fact that for every ε > 0 and every compact set K ⊂ D := {s ∈ C : 1/2 < Re(s) < 1} with connected complement we have lim inf 1 meas τ ∈ [0, T ] : max |ζ(s + iτ ) − ζ(s)| < ε > 0, (1). T →∞ T s∈K where meas denotes the Lebesgue measure on R. In other words (1) means that the set of real τ satisfying maxs∈K |ζ(s + iτ ) − ζ(s)| < ε has a positive lower density. Let us note that in the language of topological dynamics Inequality (1) says that the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the strong recurrence of the Riemann zeta-function (see [9]).

Results
Denseness Lemma
76 Page 6 of 17
Approximation by a Finite Sum Over Primes
76 Page 8 of 17
Proof of the Main Theorem
76 Page 10 of 17
76 Page 12 of 17
76 Page 14 of 17
76 Page 16 of 17

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.