Abstract

Soil health plays a major role in the ability of any nation to meet the Sustainable Development Goals. Understanding the spatial variability of soil health indicators (SHIs) may help decision makers develop effective policy strategies and make appropriate management decisions. SHIs are often spatially correlated, and if this is the case, a geostatistical model is required to capture the spatial interactions and uncertainty. Geostatistical simulation provides equally probable realizations that can account for uncertainty in the variables. This study used the following SHIs extracted from the Africa Soil Information Service “Legacy Database” for Nigeria: bulk density, organic matter, and total nitrogen. Maximum and minimum autocorrelation factors (MAF) and independent component analysis (ICA) are two techniques that can be used to transform correlated SHIs into uncorrelated factors/components that can be simulated independently. To confirm spatial orthogonality, the relative deviation from orthogonality, τ(h), and spatial diagonalization efficiency, k(h), approach 0 and 1 for both techniques. To validate the performance of each technique, 100 equally probable realizations were simulated by using MAF and ICA. Direct and cross-variograms showed adequate reproduction, using E-type, where E was defined as the “conditional expectation” of realizations (i.e., average estimate of realizations). It should be noted that only direct variograms of MAF and ICA were independently simulated. The average of 100 back-transformed simulated realizations and randomly selected realizations compared well with the original variables, in terms of spatial distribution, correlation, and pattern. Overall, both techniques were able to reproduce important geostatistical features of the original variables, making them important in joint simulations of spatially correlated variables in soil management.

Highlights

  • Soil health indicators (SHIs) play an important role in sustainable agriculture

  • The primary objective of the present study is to compare the ability of the two methods to simulate three spatially correlated soil health indicators (SHIs) (i.e., bulk density (BD), organic carbon (OC), and total nitrogen (TN)), using an international scale dataset extracted from the Africa Soil Information Service (AfSIS)

  • The SHIs used in this study (OC, TN, and BD) were extracted from the AfSIS website

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil health indicators (SHIs) play an important role in sustainable agriculture. Information about soil health will be relevant to any country aiming to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, (SDGs) especially “Zero Hunger” and “Zero Poverty”. Information on soil properties can be used in water and nutrient management, to support biomass production [1], and contribute to the functioning of the ecosystem [2]. The delivery of ecosystem goods and services through sustainable agriculture practices and management depends on soil resources [3]. The United States Department of Agriculture has characterized SHIs into three types: chemical, physical and biological. Chemical and biological SHIs, respectively, are bulk density (BD), organic carbon (OC), and total nitrogen (TN). Locations with high TN may have high OC (positive correlation), and areas with high soil compaction may have low OC and TN (negative correlation)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call