Abstract
In recent years, states have adopted a wide variety of joint sealing practices for jointed rigid pavements, based on local experience. Over time, the adoption of quality control/quality assurance practices has resulted in decreased inspection and attention that ensure compliance with good joint seal installation practices. At this time, several agencies have adopted or are considering a policy of providing for rigid pavement joints by using a single 3-mm (1/8-in.) saw cut. Agencies are either leaving this saw cut unfilled or filling it with hot-poured sealant, recognizing that it is not effectively sealed. This practice may prove acceptable where positive drainage features are naturally occurring (coarse-grained subgrade) or where climates are very hot and dry, resulting in minimal joint movement. Other agencies continue to use established joint-sealing practices with good pavement performance results. This approach continues to be a prudent one, particularly in wet climates with fine-grained subgrade materials. Here slab-support erosion has been shown to result in accelerated deterioration of jointed rigid pavements.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
