Abstract

The blood pressure (BP) is generally measured using a cuff based sphygmomanometer. However, it is inconvenient to be used. Recently, an alternative solution only using the photoplethesmograms (PPGs) was proposed. In this case, the continuous BP estimation could be performed. First, the features were extracted from the PPGs. Then, a regression network was employed to estimate the BP values. Nevertheless, the accuracy of this approach was not so high. In order to improve the estimation accuracy, this paper proposes to cascade a two layer piecewise neural network to the output of the existing regression network to correct the estimation error. In particular, the overall system is a three layer network. The first layer of the network is the existing regression network. It generates the initial estimated BP values. The second layer of the network consists of the window functions. It segments the range of the BP values into various regions for the further processing. The final layer of the network performs the estimation correction. The performance of our proposed network is evaluated via two practical datasets and three common regression networks including the three layer artificial neural network (ANN) based regression network, the random forest (RF) based regression network and the support vector regression (SVR) based network. For the first dataset, our proposed method with the RF model and the piecewise neural network achieves the systolic BP (SBP) estimation error and the diastolic BP (DBP) estimation error at <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3.01{\pm }2.22$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmHg with the correlation coefficient at 0.926 and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4.43{\pm }3.37$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmHg with the correlation coefficient at 0.935, respectively. On the other hand, the conventional RF model without the piecewise neural network achieves the SBP estimation error and the DBP estimation error at <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$5.34{\pm }4.08$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmHg with the correlation coefficient at 0.740 and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$5.89{\pm }4.98$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmHg with the correlation coefficient at 0.840, respectively. For the second dataset, our proposed method with the RF model and the piecewise neural network achieves the SBP estimation error and the DBP estimation error at <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$7.91{\pm }8.06$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmHg with the correlation coefficient at 0.876 and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3.47{\pm }5.59$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmHg with the correlation coefficient at 0.859, respectively. On the other hand, the conventional RF model without the piecewise neural network achieves the SBP estimation error and the DBP estimation error at <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$9.77{\pm }9.01$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmHg with the correlation coefficient at 0.805 and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$7.08{\pm }5.55$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mmHg with the correlation coefficient at 0.612, respectively. It can be seen that our proposed network yields the estimated BP values highly correlated to the reference BP values. Also, our proposed method yields the higher accuracies compared to the existing networks. This demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposed network.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.