Abstract

After the Second World War Britain experienced a period of considerable social, political and cultural transition, in which British people witnessed wider access to education, housing and healthcare. British design culture also felt the impact of these changes, in part because design was brought under government control to a far greater degree than ever before. Through legislation like the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act, the establishment of state-funded organizations like the Council of Industrial Design, as well as far greater participation of designers on ministerial committees, the postwar government deliberately sought to introduce ‘good design’ into people’s everyday lives. Street furniture was just one of many categories of design through which Britain’s new social, political and cultural agenda was given physical expression between the early-1950s and the late 1960s. As designed objects within the public realm, street furniture is subject to the input of numerous forces which monitor and regulate that space, and thus give it shape. During this period of transition, government ministries - in consultation with other official organizations, designers and manufacturers - initiated several major street furniture projects. As a result, the design of objects as varied as parking meters, letterboxes, road signage and traffic lights underwent significant change, which altered the face of Britain as a result. But why did the government involve itself with street furniture design at all? Were these projects acts of government-sponsored beautification, or merely part of a wider drive to modernize and upgrade the country’s designed environment? More importantly perhaps, given the changes to postwar British society, who was accountable for this process? Using extensive archival material, government records, contemporary periodicals, newspapers and interviews, this paper will examine these questions and in doing so, expose the complex negotiations that informed the design of street furniture in postwar Britain. It will focus on three examples of street furniture design - the parking meter, road signage and a letterbox – and in doing so, look closely at the British government’s design policies between the 1950s-60s, how they were enacted and the conflicts that surfaced as a consequence. By addressing the process by which these objects were reshaped, the paper will reflect on both the state’s use of design, and the capacity of design as a way to read political power in society.

Highlights

  • Seen from a distance, postwar Britain was a period characterized by radical transformation

  • Through the development of New Towns across Britain, the design of public buildings like hospitals and schools, as well as the establishment of official organizations dedicated to promoting the benefits of design - like the Council of Industrial Design - the postwar state took a deliberate hand in shaping what Ben Highmore calls ‘the designed environment’ of postwar Britain (Highmore 2009: xiii)

  • The following paper will look at the state’s use of design as a means of giving physical expression to a social, political and cultural agenda. It focuses on the state in postwar Britain, and its participation in a series of street furniture projects initiated between the mid-1950s and the late 1960s, namely Kenneth Grange’s 1958 parking meter design, Jock Kinneir and Margaret Calvert’s road signage developed between 1957-64 and David Mellor’s 1966 design for a letterbox

Read more

Summary

Blucher Design Proceedings

Dezembro de 2014, Número 5, Volume 1 www.proceedings.blucher.com.br/evento/icdhs2014. Government records, contemporary periodicals, newspapers and interviews, this paper will examine these questions and in doing so, expose the complex negotiations that informed the design of street furniture in postwar Britain. It will focus on three examples of street furniture design - the parking meter, road signage and a letterbox – and in doing so, look closely at the British government’s design policies between the 1950s-60s, how they were enacted and the conflicts that surfaced as a consequence.

Introduction
Main text
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call