Abstract

The JobMatch Talent (JMT) is a person oriented test with a focus upon working life. The test consists of ten main scales, each main scale having three underscores. The main scales (A-J) have the following designations: Work structure (A), Personal drive (B), Stress-index (C), Decision characteristics (D), Activity (E), Drive (F), Acting (G), Tolerance (H), Social interest (I), Communication (J). Previous studies have shown that the JMT has good reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and good criterion validity (both predictive and concurrent). In an initial phase, an exploratory factor model was developed and compared across groupings (N=12,650). In a second phase, correlations between the exploratory and theoretical factors were calculated. Moreover, the exploratory factors were correlated with job performance ratings (N=258). In both analyses, expected (convergent) and non-expected (divergent) relationships were systematically compared. The exploratory factors were stable with good model fit across groupings. Eight exploratory factors were obtained with an explained variance of about 72%. Large similarities, but also a few differences, emerged between the eight exploratory versus the ten theoretical factors. Correlations between corresponding factorings were high (mean = 0.70). Furthermore, correlations between the exploratory factors and job performance ratings were high (mean =0.36). It should be emphasized that these relationships were very similar to those obtained in previous studies involving the theoretical factors of the JMT. The eight exploratory factors were found to be stable and highly correlated with the theoretical factors. They were externally valid and predictive of job performance.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe construct validity of the JobMatch Talent (JMT) was investigated

  • In the present study, the construct validity of the JobMatch Talent (JMT) was investigated

  • The presentation of analyses of concepts in the JMT has been divided into two main sections:'internal' and'external' construct validity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The construct validity of the JMT was investigated. Empirical analysis of construct validity was performed at different steps. The scales in a test were examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The derived factor model was compared to a theoretical model of the test scale ('internal' construct validity). Since the JMT instrument is possibly the only recruitment instrument currently available for the sole purpose of occupational recruitment endeavors, it seems necessary to investigate further the construct validity through applications of different statistical methods. It is expected that the theoretical and practical purposes of the JMT instrument will offer greater applicability towards considerations pertaining to the potential of each ‘to-be-recruited’ or recruited individual to develop professionally within the particular position involved. All the ten main scales, taken together with the three subscales for each, were developed from pre-existing clinical and occupational instruments/questionnaires employing items to test various aspects of personality attributes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call