Abstract
Summary This paper uses worker-level data to characterize economy-wide job creation and job destruction during periods of massive structural adjustment. We contrast the gradualist Czech and the rapid Estonian approach to the destruction of the communist economy and assess their experience in light of selected theories of reallocation with frictions. We find that gradual job destruction combined with job creation support allows extensive reallocation to concur with low unemployment. Drastic job destruction, on the other hand, need not slow down job creation as long as unemployment benefits are kept very low.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
