Job and personal resources as mediators in the relationship between iron-ore mineworkers’ job demands and work engagement

Martina Kotzé,Petrus Nel

doi:10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1183

Martina Kotzé, Petrus Nel

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1183

Copy DOI

Abstract

Orientation: Mining companies are major sources of employment in South Africa. Withstanding the challenges that the mining industry faces, maintaining work engagement of employees is essential to success in this context.Research purpose: To investigate the mediating effect of job and personal resources (in parallel and serial) in the relationship between the job demands and work engagement of employees at two iron-ore mines in a remote South African locale.Motivation for the study: Most South African research on work engagement in the mining industry focuses on the role of job resources. There is a lack of research investigating the influence of both job and personal resources in the relationship between job demands and mineworkers’ work engagement.Research approach/design and method: Data were collected using questionnaires from 238 employees working for two open-pit iron-ore mines. Three mediating relationships were investigated using variance-based structural equation modelling.Main findings: The results indicate that job and personal resources (in parallel) partially mediated the relationship between job demands and work engagement, with personal resources having a stronger effect than job resources. In addition, job and personal resources (in serial) partially mediated the relationship between job demands and work engagement but not as strongly as personal resources (in parallel).Practical/managerial implications: Despite job demands, mineworkers’ work engagement can be increased by investing in interventions and a work environment that enhances job and personal resources (such as mindfulness and psychological capital).Contribution/value add: The study bridges a specific gap in the literature by exploring the role of both job and personal resources (i.e., mindfulness and psychological capital) in the relationship between mineworkers’ job demands and work engagement. No previous studies explored these variables in combination in the South African mining industry.

Highlights

South African mines are significant sources of employment for local communities (Marais et al, 2018)
Notwithstanding major changes in labour laws that improved working conditions of mineworkers over the past two decades, the mining industry is still marked by several job demands, such as work pressure, labour unrest, safety hazards, retrenchments, production demands, shift work and job insecurity (Abrahamsson et al, 2014; Malherbe & Segal, 2000; Marais & Cloete, 2013)
It is evident from the data that all variables have acceptable levels of reliability, ranging between 0.6 and 0.92

Summary

Introduction

South African mines are significant sources of employment for local communities (Marais et al, 2018). Management encourages mineworkers to meet demanding production targets in exchange for bonuses. To secure these bonuses, workers often deviate from work rules and take risks and shortcuts – sometimes with serious implications for their safety and health (Chimamise et al, 2013). Accidents and injuries in the mining environment are the result of job and production demands. Personal factors such as mineworkers’ psychological well-being, negative affectivity and job dissatisfaction lead to unnecessary risky behaviour that influences mineworkers’ safety and accident proneness (Paul & Maiti, 2007)

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion