Abstract

This article considers the issues of strengthening the mutual argumentation of the parties in the consideration of criminal cases, ensuring equality of procedural opportunities of the parties, which is an important component of it, as well as determining the position of the court. In the process of establishing the truth and determining the level of its activity in the collection, verification, and evaluation of evidence, some advanced foreign analysis was carried out on the basis of the experience of countries and the scientific views of scientists who conducted scientific research on this issue. The article also considers the special role of the stage of judicial investigation in the consideration of criminal cases in the session of the court of first instance and the issues of improving the process of judicial investigation based on the arguments of the parties. The article also analyzes the experience of foreign countries in the development of the stage of judicial investigation in criminal proceedings. Opinions of scientists of foreign countries regarding the increase of the role of the court in the process of proving, the results of surveys conducted in practice, and the uniqueness of the adversarial principle in the judicial investigation are stated. At the same time, recommendations and proposals for amendments to the criminal procedural legislation regarding the improvement of the stage of judicial investigation in the consideration of a criminal case were discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call