Abstract
Jewish Identity in Modern Germany: Memory, Power and Community, by Dean Phillip Bell. Aldershot: Ashgate Press, 2007. 188 pp. $100.00 It may be unusual to begin a review with a quote from the book's conclusion, but when the work is about memory, as Dean Bell's new book, Jewish Identity in Modern Germany: Memory, Power and Community, is, seems appropriate to start at the end and look backwards. Bell concludes this thoughtful meditation on Jewish history and memory with the following: Early modern German Jews thought about and distinguished the past in more complex ways than historians have been willing to believe. They chose from remnants of the past, deciding which customs, rules, and community structures were relevant or obsolete. They engaged the past in their efforts to explain the present and to improve themselves (p. 153). One of the pleasures of Bell's work is that he has in a concise and persuasive way demonstrated precisely what he claims. From the first chapter to the last, this book is a well otganized, clearly articulated analysis of the historiography and history of Jewish identity and memory in early modern Germany. This is no small task. In his first chaptet, Bell reviews the historiography of memory and its relationship to the telling of histoty in general, and more specifically, in the context of early modern Jewish identity. Dealing with a much contested subject that has led to heated debates regarding the best way to differentiate between memory and history, Bell ably negotiates the various arguments, beginning with a careful analysis of Maurice Halbwach's now classic study, The Collective Memory. As Bell notes, Halbwach's pioneering concepts have raised questions as well as the ire of some scholars who prefer less rigid oppositions (p. 1). Wisely, there is no attempt here to synthesize the various schools of thought, and in chapter two Bell even locates Jewish memory and history within these schools in order to analyze how chroniclers, writers of memorybooks, diarists, and biographers conceptualized and created their Jewish identity as they engaged with the past, the argument being that these narrators had increasingly sophisticated ideas about history and its many uses vis-a-vis power, authority, community, and collective memory. Along the way, Bell notes, it should be clear that early modern German Jewry was multidimensional and complex; was hardly monolithic, static, or purely religious (p. …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.