Abstract
Analysis of Gury's sources for his two principles governing the indirect voluntary both illuminates its historical development and raises questions about its meaning. The historical review reveals not only that Gury relied far more on later theologians than on Thomas Aquinas in formulating his principles, but also that two critical changes in the understanding of the indirect voluntary have created a deceptive appearance of historical continuity regarding double-effect reasoning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.