Abstract

It is a well established fact that India has been the center of famous thinkers and philosophers right from the ancient time as a result of its various philosophical traditions. These branches of thought are deeply embedded in the Indian culture and are commonly categorized as the six orthodox and the three heterodox systems of Indian philosophy. The concept of epistemology has been the topic of heavy discussion as scholars in the past have agreed or strongly disagreed on their formulations of the different schemes of metaphysics. For Indian philosophers knowledge is a means to reach at ultimate truth through speculation and experience. In this paper I am going to present the Jayanta’s refuration to Buddhist concept of pramāṇa .

Highlights

  • In the passage of time, Indian philosophy took in the various shapes of thought

  • Due to the commonality in thoughts and doctrines, these orthodox traditions have been recognized as three pairs of allied systems even though each of these systems has their own independent, distinctive ideas or views regarding the issue of metaphysics, epistemology, logic etc

  • All these orthodox systems are originally intended to reveal the correct understanding and interpretation of the Vedas which is why they are known as orthodox systems in contrast to heterodox systems like the Cārvāka, Buddhism and Jainism which do not believe in the authority of the Vedas

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the passage of time, Indian philosophy took in the various shapes of thought. Primarily, there are six Orthodox and three heterodox systems of thought. Due to the commonality in thoughts and doctrines, these orthodox traditions have been recognized as three pairs of allied systems even though each of these systems has their own independent, distinctive ideas or views regarding the issue of metaphysics, epistemology, logic etc. All these orthodox systems are originally intended to reveal the correct understanding and interpretation of the Vedas which is why they are known as orthodox systems in contrast to heterodox systems like the Cārvāka, Buddhism and Jainism which do not believe in the authority of the Vedas. This paper will examine Jayānta’s refutation of Buddhist valid cognition

Nature of Nyâyaika Knowledge
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.