Abstract
We performed an empirical study to understand how different language features are used by JavaScript developers in practice, with the goal of using this information to assist future extensions of JavaScript. We inspected more than one million unique scripts (over 80 million lines of code) from various sources: JavaScript programs in the wild collected by a spider, (supposedly) better JavaScript programs collected from the top 100 URLs from the Alex a list, JavaScript programs with new language features used in Firefox Add-ons, widely used JavaScript libraries, and Node.js applications. Our corpus is larger and more diversified than those in prior studies. We also performed a study on 45 JavaScript developers to understand the reasons behind some of their language feature choices. Our study shows that there is a wide-spread confusion about newly introduced JavaScript features, a continuing misuse of existing problematic features, and a surprising lack of adoption of object-oriented features. Understanding JavaScript programming practices will assist many stakeholders: tool developers can analyze the requirements of better tools and more responsive IDEs and programmers can learn about the used (and the good) parts of JavaScript.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
