Abstract
This paper analyzes the long-run performance of 427 issues or 387 Japanese firms that made Seasoned Equity Offerings (SEO) from 1980-1990. We find that as opposed to U.S. SEO’s that concentrate on either growth firms (low book-to-market) or small firms, Japanese SEO’s under our study period concentrated on large firms. We employ different methodologies and find that performance evaluation is sensitive to the ways the tests are done. We find that holding-period-return of the value weighted portfolio of SEOs outperform three out of four benchmarks. Our results support the notion that underperformance of issuing firms widely documented is not robust under different methodologies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
