Abstract
This article examines Jane Austen’s History of England from the reign of Henry the 4 th to the death of Charles I , by a partial, prejudiced and ignorant historian . Written when she was just fifteen, the History has recently been the subject of interest among historians. Understood as a satire upon Oliver Goldsmith’s History of England (1764), Austen’s History has not been read against the tumultuous politics of the 1790s. This article will suggest that Austen was not merely satirizing Goldsmith but, like Catherine Sawbridge Macaulay and Mary Wollstonecraft, was staking her claim in the vigorous debate around English history that emerged in the wake of Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France . While Austen’s politics were Jacobite not Jacobin, this article situates the History along side other satires refuting Burke’s spurious account of English history and as an early example of her engagement with the “feminine past.”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.