Abstract

The vulnerability of the Medtronic-Hall, Björk-Shiley Monostrut, Duromedics, and St. Jude Medical valves to occluder immobilization by sutures was determined under static and pulsatile flow conditions. Variables were cardiac output, cross-sectional diameter of suture, type of suture (braided versus monofilament) and position of the offending suture along the circumference of the valve ring. Under static conditions, pressures, ranging from 40 to 340 mmHg and 10 to 170 mmHg, were required to decompress obstructed Medtronic-Hall and Björk-Shiley Monostrut valves, respectively. As a result of different design characteristics and different occluder/orifice clearances the Medtronic-Hall valve showed its maximum opening pressure in case of interference with sutures at the axis of symmetry in both minor and major orifices, whereas for the Björk-Shiley Monostrut valve this was reached in the minor orifice. Under pulsatile flow conditions, in case of interference with Prolene 2-0 suture, the Duromedics valve showed irregularly delayed opening and an opening pressure difference of 50 mmHg at a cardiac output of 8 L/min, whereas leaflet motion and pressure difference in the St. Jude Medical valve were undisturbed under similar conditions. The necessary pressure difference for opening the Medtronic Hall valve reached 44mmHg at a cardiac output of 8 L/min. High and low risk of extrinsic leaflet obstruction in the Duromedics and St. Jude Medical valves, respectively, is related to the design of the hinge mechanisms and the wedge angle of their leaflets (2 degrees versus 25 degrees). Precautionary principles in implantation of prosthetic heart valves are stressed to prevent the potentially lethal complication of occluder immobilization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call