JAK Inhibitor Safety Compared to Traditional Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapies.

Abstract

Dermatologists treating atopic dermatitis are interested in the safety profile of the recently available JAK inhibitors, upadacitinib and abrocitinib, especially after they received boxed safety warnings. Long-term clinical trial data using these JAK inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis suggest that they are associated with very low incidence rates of malignancy, major adverse cardiac events, and thromboembolic events. However, a knowledge gap exists regarding the incidence of adverse events for JAK inhibitors compared to traditional systemic therapies used to treat poorly controlled atopic dermatitis as well as baseline rates in both atopic dermatitis and reference control populations. To address this gap, we analyzed data regarding adverse events of special interest for methotrexate, cyclosporine, and systemic corticosteroids and calculated the incidence of adverse events per 100 patient-years for these drugs. We also examined data regarding baseline incidence of adverse events in atopic dermatitis and control patients. We found that compared to upadacitinib and abrocitinib, traditional systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis demonstrated equal or higher incidence rates for malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), non-melanoma skin cancer, major adverse cardiac events, and venous thromboembolism. Moreover, the use of upadacitinib and abrocitinib also exhibited either comparable or lower incidence of malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), major adverse cardiac events, and venous thromboembolism, but higher rates of non-melanoma skin cancer, in comparison to baseline rates in atopic dermatitis or control patients. These findings indicate that JAK inhibitors should be positioned, at least based on safety, ahead of traditional systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis treatment.J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(12):1298-1303. doi:10.36849/JDD.7187.