Abstract
The principal aim of the present paper is to evaluate J. Gibson's contribution to the comprehension of visual perception. It is concluded that some definitions or the concepts and principles of the ecological approach are self-contradictory and unessential. The theory of direct perception doesn't allow many important experimental findings to be explained. It is because of the limitations in J. Gibson's theory that the latter can't be considered a significant alternative to the theories in which emphasis is placed on the importance of internal representation for perceptual processes.
Highlights
The principai aim of the present paper is to evaluate J
HaM Ka>KeTCA, lfTO npoee.QeHHblM 8H8nlll3 TeūplllM Henocpe.QCTBeHHOro eocnplllATlllA .ųaeT OCHOB8Hllel YTBep>K.Q8Tb, lfTO Heo6xO.QllMl O npll3l H8Tb peanbHOCTblO CYll.leCTBOB8Hllle BHYTJ)eHHllXl penpe3eHT81.ĮllMl 111 llXl ponb B nepųenTlllBHblX npoųeccax
Summary
Nono>KeH11e, 'ITO 11HcpopMaų11A MO>KeT 6b1Tb nepeAaHa 11 npe.1n1. 'ITO OHa MO>KeT 6b1Tb coxpaHeHa, ABnAeTCA eepHblM B Teop1111 KOM-' Hanp111Mep, ow1116o'IHO yTBep>1
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
