Abstract
The principal aim of the present paper is to evaluate J. Gibson's contribution to the comprehension of visual perception. It is concluded that some definitions or the concepts and principles of the ecological approach are self-contradictory and unessential. The theory of direct perception doesn't allow many important experimental findings to be explained. It is because of the limitations in J. Gibson's theory that the latter can't be considered a significant alternative to the theories in which emphasis is placed on the importance of internal representation for perceptual processes.
Highlights
The principai aim of the present paper is to evaluate J
HaM Ka>KeTCA, lfTO npoee.QeHHblM 8H8nlll3 TeūplllM Henocpe.QCTBeHHOro eocnplllATlllA .ųaeT OCHOB8Hllel YTBep>K.Q8Tb, lfTO Heo6xO.QllMl O npll3l H8Tb peanbHOCTblO CYll.leCTBOB8Hllle BHYTJ)eHHllXl penpe3eHT81.ĮllMl 111 llXl ponb B nepųenTlllBHblX npoųeccax
Summary
Nono>KeH11e, 'ITO 11HcpopMaų11A MO>KeT 6b1Tb nepeAaHa 11 npe.1n1. 'ITO OHa MO>KeT 6b1Tb coxpaHeHa, ABnAeTCA eepHblM B Teop1111 KOM-' Hanp111Mep, ow1116o'IHO yTBep>1
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.