IVC measurement for the noninvasive evaluation of central venous pressure.

Abstract

Central venous pressure (CVP) is one of only a handful of variables that can be used to assess a patient's volume status to attempt to optimize stroke volume. The gold standard method for assessing CVP is though pulmonary artery catheterization, which is invasive and risks severe complications such as pneumothorax and cardiac conduction abnormalities. Current noninvasive methods for estimating CVP such as jugular venous pressure assessment are imperfect with wide inter-examiner variability. The inferior vena cava (IVC) is a highly compliant vessel that uniquely does not constrict in response to hypovolemia, making it an ideal, noninvasive surrogate for the estimation of CVP. A range of IVC indices including minimum and maximum IVC diameter and fraction of IVC collapse with inspiration (known as collapsibility index) have been studied with highly variable results that range from excellent to poor correlation between these values and CVP. Despite this inconsistency in findings, multiple schemes have been proposed to attempt to estimate CVP from IVC measurements, but when prospectively tested, none has been shown to be accurate. Since the most recent 2015 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines, multiple studies have identified unique ways of improving the accuracy of IVC measurement, which could translate into better CVP estimation. The goal of this review is to summarize the many, often conflicting studies that exist in this area, and provide recommendations for future studies based on our findings.