Abstract
The aim of this essay is to identify and critically assess the key concepts, ideas, epistemological principles, and the relational – symmetric and asymmetric – aspects of the ongoing global division of sociological labor. The third part of the essay attempts to explore the ambivalent relations between the ‘global’ content and ‘national’ form of public sociology. There are four dilemmas that confront Michael Burawoy in his attempts to articulate the idea of public sociology in a globalising context: first, the contradiction between the universal content and national form of public sociology; second, the contradiction between analytical realism and pluralist relativism; third, the (nominal) contradiction between artificial types of public sociology and critical sociology; fourth, the contradiction between epistemological pluralism and value pluralism. The conclusion is that, despite the excessively ethnocentric principles of so-called ‘methodological nationalism’, it is precisely the claim to more cosmopolitan sociological principles that makes an overly ‘national’ form of public sociology ‘global’. The main task is to ensure the ongoing power of public sociology to make global sociological discourse negotiable. What is needed in public sociology is not another symmetric-functional historicism, but a deeper critical understanding of both analytical theoretical frameworks and normative discourses, including the attempts to understand the unevenly distributed global sociological field of asymmetric institutional and intellectual power relations.
Highlights
There are four dilemmas that confront Michael Burawoy in his attempts to articulate the idea of public sociology in a globalising context: first, the contradiction between the universal content and national form of public sociology; second, the contradiction between analytical realism and pluralist relativism; third, the contradiction between artificial types of public sociology and critical sociology; fourth, the contradiction between epistemological pluralism and value pluralism
The main task is to ensure the ongoing power of public sociology to make global sociological discourse negotiable
What is needed in public sociology is not another symmetric-functional historicism, but a deeper critical understanding of both analytical theoretical frameworks and normative discourses, including the attempts to understand the unevenly distributed global sociological field of asymmetric institutional and intellectual power relations
Summary
Burawoy’us pirmenybę teikia kosmopolitizmui3 pabrėždamas, kad nors JAV sociologija pateikia save kaip universalią, tačiau tiek jos turinys, tiek ir forma yra specifiniai reiškiniai (ten pat; 49). Kaip tik todėl – nes tai kasdienis sociologo plebiscitas – verta svarstyti Michaelo Burawoy’aus viešosios sociologijos idėją kartu kritiškai atsakant į klausimą, ar ši koncepcija susiduria su esminiu prieštaravimu tarp universalaus viešosios sociologijos turinio ir nacionalinės jos formos.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.