Abstract

Many species on endangered species lists such as the IUCN Red List (RL) are categorized using demographic factors such as numbers of mature individuals. Genetic factors are not currently used in the RL even though their explicit consideration, including effective population size (Ne) and expected heterozygosity-loss (H-loss), could improve the assessment of extinction risk. Here, we consider the estimation of Ne and H-loss in the context of RL species. First, we investigate the reporting of number of mature individuals for RL Endangered species, which is needed to estimate Ne and H-loss. We found 77% of species assessments studied here did not report methods used to estimate the number of mature adults, and that these assessments rarely report other important determinants of Ne (e.g., sex ratio, variance in family size). We therefore applied common rules of thumb to estimate Ne, and found that Ne was likely < 50 for at least 25% of the 170 RL Endangered species studied here. We also estimated mean expected H-loss for these species over the next 100 years, and found it to be 9–29%. These estimates of high H-loss and low Ne suggest that some species listed as Endangered likely warrant listing as Critically Endangered if genetic considerations were included. We recommend that RL and other assessment frameworks (i) report methods used for estimating the number of mature adults, (ii) include standardized information on species traits that influence Ne to facilitate Ne estimation, and (iii) consider using concepts like Ne and heterozygosity-loss in risk assessments.

Highlights

  • The one process going on that will take millions of years to correct is the loss of genetic and species diversity by the destruction of natural habitats

  • To analyze the assessments of EN species listed under Criterion D, we filtered all species assessments currently available on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List (n = 105,732) to include only those species listed as Endangered (EN; n = 9754), and filtered to include only those categorized as EN under Criterion D alone (n = 222)

  • The final, working dataset of 170 assessments included all species on the IUCN Red List with available population size estimates in the endangered (EN) category listed under Criterion D

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The one process going on that will take millions of years to correct is the loss of genetic and species diversity by the destruction of natural habitats. This is the folly our descendants are least likely to forgive us. The most recognized worldwide index for biodiversity is the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List. This list results from a large, informative, and continually updated database dedicated to “providing the world with the most objective, scientifically-based information on the current status of globally threatened biodiversity” (IUCN 2001).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.