Abstract

Italian Sounding—i. e., the Italian appearance of a product or service brand irrespective of its country of origin—represents a global market phenomenon affecting a wide range of economic sectors, particularly the agro-food sector. Although its economic impact has been repeatedly stressed from different points of view (policy, economy, culture, etc.), systematic scientific knowledge regarding its social–psychological bases is lacking. Three studies carried out in three different countries (Italy, China, and USA) address this literature gap. Different consumer groups (both native and/or non-native) are targeted regarding major product categories pre-selected categories, which are the major Italian food goods within the specific country according to piloting (oil and/or pasta). In each study, the main independent variable (product version) has been manipulated by presenting real product images (previously pre-selected within the tested food category in each country market), whose “Italianness” degree is effectively manipulated by the main study variable (product version) across three or four levels (Protected Designation of Origin Made in Italy, Made in Italy, Italian Sounding, and Generic Foreign). Main hypotheses are tested via a survey with the specific product images administered to samples in Italy (N = 204, 148 Italians and 56 non-Italians), China (N = 191, 100 Chinese and 91 non-Italian expatriates in China), and the USA (N = 237 US citizens). Across the three studies, results show that Made in Italy products, compared to the other ones, are advantaged in terms of the main dependent variables: reputation profile, general reputation, attitude, and willingness to pay (WTP). Moreover, Italian Sounding products are endowed with corresponding significant advantages when compared to the Generic Foreign by non-Italian samples (although to a different degree according to the different sub-samples). Results reveal the specific social–psychological profile of Italian Sounding products in terms of either weaknesses or strengths when compared to both Made in Italy products and Generic Foreign ones, differently in the eyes of Italian and non-Italian consumers across different countries. Finally, consistently across the three studies, the extent to which a food product is perceived to be Italian increases consumers' WTP for that product, and this effect is consistently mediated by the product's reputation.

Highlights

  • The food industry is the second most important sector of Italian economy, making Italy the 10th exporter of this sector in the world [ISMEA (Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare), 2017]

  • In order to test H1, H2 and H3, a series of 2 × 4 mixed-model ANOVAs were run to verify the effect of the independent variables on the dependent variables, for the two food products aggregated

  • Results confirm H1: product label has an effect on reputation such that it is more positive for the Italian products ( PDO) compared to both the Italian Sounding and the Generic Foreign products; PDO Made in Italy’s positive reputation is stronger than that of Made in Italy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The food industry is the second most important sector of Italian economy, making Italy the 10th exporter of this sector in the world [ISMEA (Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare), 2017]. Agro-food “Made in Italy” products—with features evoking an “Italian” concept in the world, including history, culture, and tradition (Napolitano et al, 2015; Temperini et al, 2016)—are typical goods of the Mediterranean diet [Antimiani and Henke, 2007; ISMEA (Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare) and Fondazione Qualivita, 2018], and they currently spearhead Italian exports in terms of technologies, procedures, and intrinsic transformation of raw materials (Carbone and Henke, 2012; Caiazza and Volpe, 2014; Coldiretti, 2015). Italian agro-food distinctive products constitute about 80% of domestic exports in the food sector, with a recent growing appreciation especially in China (Huliyeti et al, 2008; Snaiderbaur, 2009; Vianelli et al, 2012a).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call