Abstract
The paper examines the reponse of New Zealand's Parliament to landmark human rights decisions. It also discusses the general debate on human rights in Parliament. Conversely it examines the courts' attitude towards the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. The paper' s thesis is that a dialogue between the New Zealand courts and Parliament exists.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
