Abstract

Sexually dimorphic weaponry often results from intrasexual selection, and weapon size can vary seasonally when costs of bearing the weapon exceed the benefits outside of the reproductive season. Weapons can also be favored in competition over nonreproductive resources such as food or shelter, and if such nonreproductive competition occurs year‐round, weapons may be less likely to vary seasonally. In snapping shrimp (Alpheus angulosus), both sexes have an enlarged snapping claw (a potentially deadly weapon), and males of many species have larger claws than females, although females are more aggressive. This contrasting sexual dimorphism (larger weaponry in males, higher aggression in females) raises the question of whether weaponry and aggression are favored by the same mechanisms in males and females. We used field data to determine whether either sex shows seasonal variation in claw size such as described above. We found sexual dimorphism increased during the reproductive season due to opposing changes in both male and female claw size. Males had larger claws during the reproductive season than during the nonreproductive season, a pattern consistent with sexual selection. Females, however, had larger claws during the nonreproductive season than during the reproductive season—a previously unknown pattern of variation in weapon size. The observed changes in female weapon size suggest a trade‐off between claw growth and reproduction in the reproductive season, with investment in claw growth primarily in the nonreproductive season. Sexually dimorphic weaponry in snapping shrimp, then, varies seasonally due to sex differences in seasonal patterns of investment in claw growth, suggesting claws may be advantageous for both sexes but in different contexts. Thus, understanding sexual dimorphisms through the lens of one sex yields an incomplete understanding of the factors favoring their evolution.

Highlights

  • Sexual selection often leads to sexual dimorphisms in behavior, ornamentation, or weaponry (Darwin, 1871)

  • Sexual dimorphisms in weaponry are often the result of intrasexual selection where males compete for resources necessary for reproduction or access to females (Darwin, 1871)

  • If weapon size can vary seasonally, males would be predicted to invest more in weapon growth during the reproductive season, as we found here in snapping shrimp

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Sexual selection often leads to sexual dimorphisms in behavior, ornamentation, or weaponry (Darwin, 1871). Aggressive behaviors and weaponry can be advantageous in contexts other than same‐sex competition for reproductive resources, such as defense of shelter in the nonreproductive season or competition over food (Lyon & Montgomerie, 2012; Tobias, Montgomerie, & Lyon, 2012), and if the benefits of such competition differ between the sexes, such nonreproductive competition could favor sexual dimorphisms in weaponry or aggression as well. Direct evidence for the effect of weapon size on reproductive success in either sex is lacking, and the indirect evidence that is available does not support a reproductive advantage for larger claws in males. Seasonal variation in claw size, may provide insight into the relative roles of competition for reproductive versus competition for nonreproductive resources in favoring larger weapon size within each sex. If larger weaponry is primarily advantageous in contests for reproductive resources, claws would be expected to be relatively larger during the reproductive season than the nonreproductive season; in contrast, if larger weaponry is primarily advantageous in contests over nonreproductive resources, the relationship between claw and body size would not be expected to show seasonal variation

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call