Abstract

This paper studies the association between major ability beliefs and course-taking patterns, and finds that previous works have likely inflated the role of ability sorting. Using administrative transcript data, I find that before declaring their first major, most students have completed at least 10% of the course requirements in many majors. I create a dynamic course-taking to interpret these diverse course-taking patterns. The model informs my estimation strategy of the association between ability beliefs and course histories on subsequent course-taking. I find positive associations between ability beliefs and continuing to satisfy a majors’ course requirements. These associations substantially attenuate when controlling for course histories, suggesting the effort costs needed to graduate act against ability sorting.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call