Abstract
ABSTRACT The word cunt is the second most popular subject of offensive language charges and infringement notices in New South Wales, after fuck. While the latter word has been the subject of considered academic and judicial critique, the basis for any legal offensiveness ascribed to the former term has received inadequate scholarly and jurisprudential attention. Noting the power of judicial discourse to shape what is criminally offensive, in this article, I evaluate judicial views on the ‘c-word’ with reference to sociolinguistic literature on swearing. I find that many of the judicial representations do not withstand scrutiny. The article may aid lawyers attempting to demonstrate evolving views on the word cunt in courtroom advocacy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
