It Matters! Emotion Regulation Strategy Use Moderates the Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Supervisor-Directed Deviance

Abstract

This study examined the moderating effects of cognitive reappraisal and emotional suppression, two contrasting and representative emotion regulation strategies, on the abusive supervision - supervisor-directed deviance relationship. We tested the moderation hypotheses with two samples. Sample 1 consisted of a group of 499 English-speaking full-time workers recruited from TurkPrime. Sample 2 included a group of 318 Chinese full-time workers from various organizations. These two samples provided convergent evidence for the moderation effects of both cognitive reappraisal and emotional suppression. Specifically, cognitive reappraisal weakened the relationship between abusive supervision and supervisor-directed deviance such that the relationship was weaker among employees with higher than lower cognitive reappraisal. Emotional suppression exaggerated the association between abusive supervision and supervisor-directed deviance such that this association was stronger for employees with higher than lower emotional suppression. Our findings highlight the differential effectiveness of cognitive reappraisal and emotional suppression in coping with abusive supervision. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.