Abstract

Obstacles are represented in the attentional landscape. However, it is currently unclear what the exclusive contribution of attention is to the avoidance response. This is because in earlier obstacle avoidance designs, it was impossible to disentangle an effect of attention from the changing features of the obstacle (e.g., its identity, size, or orientation). Conversely, any feature manipulation could be interpreted as an attentional as well as an obstacle effect on avoidance behavior. We tested the possible tuning of avoidance responses by a spatial cue in two experiments. In both experiments, spatial and nonspatial cues were separately given as go cues for an obstacle avoidance task. Participants had to reach past two obstacles in Experiment 1, and past a single obstacle in Experiment 2. We found that when the right obstacle was flashed, participants veered away more and produced more-variable trajectories over trials than in conditions with nonspatial and left spatial cues, regardless of the presence or absence of another obstacle. Therefore, we concluded that the tuning of avoidance responses can be influenced by spatial cues. Moreover, we speculated that a flashed obstacle receives more attentional weighting in the attentional landscape and prompts a stronger repulsion away from the obstacle.

Highlights

  • Obstacles are represented in the attentional landscape

  • We investigated whether a spatial cue can influence obstacle avoidance

  • We showed that the avoidance response is tuned by a spatial cue

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Obstacles are represented in the attentional landscape. it is currently unclear what the exclusive contribution of attention is to the avoidance response. Other experiments have shown that the capture of attention by a nontarget can change the motor responses to target objects (Chang & Abrams, 2004; Tipper, Howard, & Jackson, 1997; Welsh, 2011; Welsh & Elliott, 2004; Welsh, Elliott, & Weeks, 1999). The changes in motor responses evoked by salient distractors and visual cues are thought to be due to the biased resolution of competition between a target and distractor during action selection (i.e., which object to reach for), whereas obstacle features (e.g., location, size) must be incorporated in the motor plan that brings the hand and arm around the obstacle and toward the target. For the first time, the present experiments offer the opportunity to study the effect of attention without changing the spatial features of the to-be-avoided obstacles

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call