Abstract
In this paper, we explore how the choices of boundary work in software development influence the team autonomy enacted by team members. Boundary work is when people protect their professional individual autonomy, when they downplay that autonomy to collaborate over professional boundaries, and when they create new boundaries. Team autonomy is here defined as a team using their autonomy to collaborate in deciding their own output. We use an action research design, with varied methodologies carried out through three action cycles. Our findings show that when collective, collaborative boundary work is not performed, a sort of individualized zone occurs where individuals either try to do collaborative boundary work by themselves or seek individual autonomy. We propose that individual autonomy can be divided into professional individual autonomy and situationally dependent individual autonomy. This research contributes theoretically by showing how the absence of collaborative boundary work can lead to an individualized zone. Practically, it can improve team autonomy by enhancing the understanding of why teams should perform collaborative boundary work. The value of the concept of boundary work used in this setting involves studying the intentions for collaboration, not whether collaboration actually takes place.
Highlights
Gieryn (1983) coined the term boundary work to describe the protection of professional autonomy
Our research focus was on how the choice of boundary work in software development teams influences the team autonomy
Our findings indicate that individual professional autonomy makes it harder to carry out alignment in a team, because each individual is determined to assume the responsibility for their part of the work
Summary
Gieryn (1983) coined the term boundary work to describe the protection of professional autonomy In his description of boundary work, Gieryn argued that scientists construct a boundary between the production of scientific knowledge and the way in which non-scientists consume that knowledge, with the goal of having immunity from blame for the way non-scientists use the knowledge (Gieryn 1983). The professionals protect their right to determine and perform the work as they see fit. The team collaborate to define the goals and their approach, and they work interdependently to achieve them
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
