Abstract

Margin squeeze as a stand-alone category of abuse of dominant position appears to be redundant. The imputation rule used in EU competition law in margin squeeze cases does include opportunity costs and is often a good proxy for the relevant costs of the dominant firm, although it does not only protect equally efficient competitors, but also reasonably efficient competitors. Including opportunity costs in EU competition law assessment of exclusionary practices distils every abusive margin squeeze to a predatory pricing case, caught by the Court's predatory pricing-test laid down in AKZO.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.