Abstract

The paper presents an analysis of problems which had to be dealt with by Lithuanian institutions while implementing environmental requirements laid down in Article 11 of European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC on Packaging and Packaging Waste as well as in Decision 2009/292/EC of the European Commission establishing the conditions for derogation of plastic crates and plastic pallets related to heavy metal concentration limits set by Directive 94/62/EC. While the Directive puts ban on the usage of packaging with the aggregate concentration of 4 heavy metals (lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent chromium) exceeding 100 ppm, Decision 2009/292/EC, instead, allows their usage if terms of derogation specified in the Decision are met. The implementation of the Decision means that each crate and/or pallet item circulating in the market with the concentration of the 4 heavy metals above the set level has to be identified, accounted, traced while in service, must at the end of service be delivered into a controlled recycling system and finally recycled in a way specified by the Decision. Therefore, the establishment of such a country-wide system presents a challenging task for the country as EU legislation sets no common requirements for its structure and leaves it to the country’s discretion. This paper systematises and summarises some principles and practices of managing the usage of plastic crates and plastic pallets containing the amount of heavy metals higher than 100 ppm (as set by Directive 94/62/EC) in the EU Member States. The paper analyses possibilities and offers several scenarios for implementation of Directive 94/62/EC with respect to plastic crates and pallets with high concentration of heavy metals in Lithuania. Both the Directive and the Decision are based on using the data available from bookkeeping conducted by owners of crates and pallets and the EU environmental accounting/control system used in the country. The offered mechanisms are analysed and compared between themselves as well as with analogue systems used in other EU countries. Besides, the problem of unidentified plastic crates and plastic pallets already in use is being discussed. A special decision-making tree was developed to allow splitting the stream of these items into 2 flows with the concentration of heavy metals below and above the 100 ppm limit. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.71.2.7167

Highlights

  • The primary document, which states the principles of environmental policy in the packaging sector in the EU and regulates some essential requirements, is European Parliament and CouncilLebedys, Milčius, Bendoraitis, Varžinskas, & KarpušenkaitėDirective on Package and Packaging Waste 94/62/EC

  • The analysis showed that despite the efforts of the industry to recycle and reuse old plastic crates and pallets, there were a lot of pallets and crates with increased heavy metal concentration still circulating

  • The feedback from them indicates that the demand by the Commission Decision requiring that not less than 90% of plastic crates and pallets with excessive concentration of heavy metals should be returned to the owner is realistic and the volume of lost items can be maintained within the 10% limit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The primary document, which states the principles of environmental policy in the packaging sector in the EU and regulates some essential requirements, is European Parliament and Council. According to provisions of Article 2 of the Commission Decision, the total concentration of heavy metals in plastic crates and plastic pallets can exceed the 100 ppm limit only if this packaging is used in a closed and controllable product circuit; other requirements are met. The latter requirements are related to manufacture, repair, management, recycling and information documentation of these products. If individuals or legal persons use plastic crates and pallets with excess heavy metal concentration, they are required to declare this and organise the usage of this type of packaging according to national legislation ensuring that the provisions of the Commission Decision are observed.

No further tests are necessary
Flow of not suitable for further use empty crates and pallets
Findings
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.