Abstract
The controversy surrounding the adoption of an appropriate petroleum product pricing regime in Nigeria reached a head in the past few years against a background of poor public finances, endemic cross-border product smuggling resulting in domestic shortages, the fact that the state oil corporation is perpetually behind in its cash-call obligation to joint venture partners and the necessity to modernise the oil sector's infrastructure. This paper looks at different approaches to petroleum product pricing, including exhaustible resource, market-based and capital-replacement methods, as well as international price comparisons, with the conclusion that while the case for a subsidy phase-out is overwhelming, the issue was unnecessarily politicised by past governments, thus arousing great suspicion among the public. Surprisingly, the public is aware of the need for appropriate pricing but their historic mistrust of government, arising from a poor record of financial accountability, is a major source of the general resistance to the removal of subsidies. For the policy to succeed, the government needs to address these concerns, in addition to investing the proceeds of increased petroleum prices judiciously in sectors that will directly benefit the bulk of the citizenry.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.