Abstract
This study discusses issues for the institutionalization of the litigation system targeting the city planning decision as the object of administrative litigation by means of a review of a Supreme Court decision regarding a land readjustment project in Hamamatsu City. As the issues involved in institutional reform of the city planning litigation system, it points out (i) the necessity of judging the city planning decision of the project and zoning types as the administrative disposition, (ii) as for the zoning types, in particular, the necessity of the institutional design based on its inherent character, and (iii) the expansion of the kind and scope of legal protection of interests concerning the standing. Finally, this study argues for the necessity of expanding the object and content of the city planning decision and improving the legal role of the master plan as issues to be considered for reform of the city planning institution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
