Abstract

Successful prosthetic rehabilitation is essential to improve the physical and mental outcomes of people with lower-limb amputation. Evaluation of prosthetic services from a prosthesis user perspective have been published and commissioned by the national bodies, however, the perspectives of clinicians working with service users during rehabilitation have not to date been sought. We sought to determine factors impacting lower-limb prosthetic rehabilitation from a clinician's perspective to inform studies focusing on prosthetic and socket design and fitting. Six clinician (2 prosthetists, 4 physiotherapists) interviewees were self-selected from a survey exploring issues and frustrations during lower-limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Semi-structured interviews explored the impactors on and frustrations with rehabilitation and the prosthetic socket. A thematic analysis was subsequently conducted to identify themes in the responses. Five themes were identified: Service Disparity, Body Impactors, Consequences of Ill-Fit, Prosthesis Irritants, and Limitations of Practice. Each theme, though distinct, relates to the others either as a cause or consequence and should be viewed as such. Addressing the themes will have benefits beyond the issues addressed but also expand into the other themes. This study provides an insight into the clinician perspectives on lower-limb prosthetic rehabilitation, which has not been formally documented to date.

Highlights

  • Successful prosthetic rehabilitation of people with lower-limb amputations is vital to their ability to live and function independently

  • This study aims to start to highlight the experiences of rehabilitation clinicians, and how they impact lowerlimb prosthetic rehabilitation

  • The thematic analysis gives an insight into the first-hand perspectives of clinicians involved in lower-limb prosthetic rehabilitation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Successful prosthetic rehabilitation of people with lower-limb amputations is vital to their ability to live and function independently. Some evaluation of prosthetic services from a prosthesis user perspective have been published in literature [1,2,3], and commissioned by the National Health Service (NHS) [4]. Issues such as the satisfaction and comfort with the prosthesis, difficulties with lifestyle adjustment and communication between clinicians and patients have been reported. Throughout rehabilitation, patients interact with various clinicians, including occupational therapists and surgeons, amongst others Most of their interactions will be with prosthetists, who prescribe and fit the prosthesis, and physiotherapists, who guide strength training and movement re-education.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.