Abstract
In Roadshow Films v iiNet, the High Court unanimously held that iiNet was not liable for copyright infringements committed by its subscribers by means of the BitTorrent peer-to-peer file-sharing system. While the two judgments delivered by the High Court have clarified the extent to which ISPs may be liable for end-user infringements, they have created considerable legal uncertainty about authorisation liability, which is the main Australian doctrine under which a person may be found liable for the infringing conduct of another person. This article explains and analyses the two judgments delivered by the High Court in iiNet, focussing on the implications of the decision for ISPs, and for authorisation liability more generally.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
