Abstract

<p>Emissions from fossil fuels are one of the primary sources of atmospheric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) growth. However, estimates of anthropogenic CH<sub>4</sub> emissions still show large uncertainties on global and regional scales. Differences in CH<sub>4</sub> isotopic source signatures δ<sup>13</sup>C and δD can help to constrain different source contributions (e.g. fossil, thermogenic, or biogenic).</p><p>The Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB) represents one of the largest European CH<sub>4</sub> emission source regions, with more than 500 Gg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>-1</sup> released by more than 50 coal mine ventilation shafts. During the CoMet (Carbon Dioxide and Methane Mission) campaign in June 2018 methane observations were conducted from a variety of platforms including aircraft and cars. Beside the continuous sampling of atmospheric methane concentration, numerous air samples were taken from inside the ventilation shafts, around the ventilation shafts (1‑2 km distance) and aboard the DLR Cessna Caravan aircraft and analyzed in the laboratory for the isotopic composition of CH<sub>4</sub>.</p><p>The ground-based samples allowed determining the source signatures of individual ventilation shafts. These signatures displayed a considerable range between different shafts and also varied from day to day. The airborne samples contained a mixture of methane emissions from several mines and thus enabled accurately determining the signature of the entire region. The mean isotopic signature of methane emissions over the USCB derived from the aircraft samples was -51.9 ± 0.5 ‰ for δ<sup>13</sup>C and -233 ± 6 ‰ for δD. This is in between the range of other microbial and thermogenic coal reservoirs, but more depleted in δD than previous USCB studies reported based on samples taken within the mines. Signatures of methane enhancements sampled upwind of the mines and in the free troposphere clearly showed the presence of methane of biogenic origin (e.g. wetlands, waste, ruminants).</p><p>Furthermore, we simulated the methane isotopologues using the on-line three-times nested global regional chemistry climate model MECO(n). We implemented a submodel extension, which includes the kinetic fractionation and uses the isotopic source signatures determined by the ground-based observations. We compare the regional simulations to flask samples taken during CoMet.</p>

Highlights

  • CO2 and Methane Mission (CoMet) 1.0 HALO aircraft observations, entire USCB (2 flights) Weighted average of single mine isotopic signatures

  • The CH4, CO2, and CO emissions of the entire USCB have been assessed from flights 4 and 5 with an airborne mass balance technique

  • Isotopic signatures vary for different flights and parts of the USCB

Read more

Summary

Introduction

USCB emission estimate from mass balance and comparison with inventoriesThe CH4, CO2, and CO emissions of the entire USCB have been assessed from flights 4 and 5 with an airborne mass balance technique.CH4: Airborne estimate in the lower range of the six presented emission inventories. 1. Overview: Isotopic composition of different methane sources 4. Overview of isotopic signatures of different methane sources CoMet 1.0 HALO aircraft observations, entire USCB (2 flights) Weighted average of single mine isotopic signatures (weighting by measured fluxes or fluxes reported by E-PRTR) USCB emission estimate from mass balance and comparison with inventories

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call