Abstract
AbstractCrack growth tests of 316LN stainless steel under load‐controlled and strain‐controlled thermo‐mechanical fatigue (TMF) loadings at the temperature range of 350°C ~ 550°C were conducted. Moreover, the isothermal fatigue (IF) crack growth tests at the maximum temperature of 550°C were performed for comparison. The differences in IF and TMF crack propagation behavior under different loading conditions were thoroughly discussed, and the underlying mechanisms were revealed by a comprehensive characterization of the deformation state of the crack tip region using digital image correlation (DIC) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) methods. Furthermore, it was found that the EBSD characterization was simply based on a single plane made it difficult to evaluate the complex crack growth behavior. In addition, the limitations of the classical parameter of stress intensity factor under TMF loading were presented.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
