Abstract

The use of a poly(methylmethacrylate) chip, provided with two separation channels in the column-coupling (CC) arrangement and on-column conductivity detection sensors, to electrophoretic separations of a group of inorganic anions (chloride, nitrate, sulfate, nitrite, fluoride and phosphate) that need to be monitored in various environmental matrices was studied. The electrophoretic methods employed in this study included isotachophoresis (ITP) and capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) with on-line coupled ITP sample pretreatment (ITP–CZE). Hydrodynamic and electroosmotic flows of the solution in the separation compartment of the CC chip were suppressed and electrophoresis was a dominant transport process in the separations performed by these methods. ITP separations on the chip provided rapid resolutions of sub-nmol amounts of the complete group of the studied anions and made possible rapid separations and reproducible quantitations of macroconstituents currently present in water samples (chloride, nitrate and sulfate). However, concentration limits of detection attainable under the employed ITP separating conditions (2–3·10 −5 mol/l) were not sufficient for the detection of typical anionic microconstituents in water samples (nitrite, fluoride and phosphate). On the other hand, these anions could be detected at 5–7·10 −7 mol/l concentrations by the conductivity detector in the CZE stage of the ITP–CZE combination on the CC chip. A sample clean-up performed in the ITP stage of the combination effectively complemented such a detection sensitivity and nitrite, fluoride and phosphate could be reproducibly quantified also in samples containing the macroconstituents at 10 4 higher concentrations. ITP–CZE analyses of tap, mineral and river water samples showed that the CC chip offers means for rapid and reproducible procedures to the determination of these anions in water (4–6 min analysis times under our working conditions). Here, the ITP sample pretreatment concentrated the analytes and removed nanomol amounts of the macroconstituents from the separation compartment of the chip within 3–4 min. Both the ITP and ITP–CZE procedures required no or only minimum manipulations with water samples before their analyses on the chip. For example, tap water samples were analyzed directly while a short degassing of mineral water (to prevent bubble formation during the separation) and filtration of river water samples (to remove particulates and colloids) were the only operations needed in this respect.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call