Isometric dynamometry, dependent on knee angle, is a suitable alternative to isokinetic dynamometry when evaluating quadriceps strength symmetry in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract

BackgroundKnee extensor strength deficits increase re-injury risk following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This study investigated whether isometric strength testing methods are a suitable alternative to isokinetic assessment for identifying knee extensor strength asymmetry. MethodsThis study recruited 22 patients at 9–12 months after ACLR and 22 healthy controls. The single hop for distance (SHD) and knee extensor strength via isokinetic (60°/s and 120°/s) and isometric (positions of 90°, 60° and 30° of flexion, from full knee extension) methods were assessed. Absolute scores (normalized to body weight) and limb symmetry indices (LSIs) were calculated, with t-tests employed for statistical comparisons. ResultsThe SHD LSI was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than both isokinetic speeds and the 30° isometric position. No significant LSI differences (p > 0.01) existed within isokinetic or isometric test conditions. In ACLR patients, only the 60°/s isokinetic condition was significantly lower (p = 0.005) than the 60° isometric condition. When normalized to body weight, the operated limb in ACLR patients was significantly weaker than the non-operated limb during peak isokinetic strength testing at 60°/s (p = 0.001) and 120°/s (p = 0.010), as well as isometric testing at 30° (p = 0.009). Compared with controls, ACLR patients demonstrated significantly lower (p < 0.01) mean LSIs across most measures. ConclusionsAssessment of knee extensor strength via isometric methods appears suitable in the absence of isokinetic testing equipment, though consideration of test angle (30° and 90° knee angles better detect asymmetries similar to isokinetic testing) is important.