Isometric-based test improves EMG-threshold determination in boys vs. men.

Abstract

Children have been hypothesized to utilize higher-threshold (type-II) motor units (MUs) to a lesser extent than adults. Two recent studies, using a cycling-based EMG-threshold (EMGTh) protocol, supported the hypothesis, showing children's EMGTh intensities to be higher than adults'. Conclusions, however, were hampered by children's low EMGTh detection rates. Insufficiently high contractile forces at exhaustion were postulated as the reason for non-detection, predominantly in children. An intermittent isometric contraction test (IICT) protocol facilitates higher contractile forces prior to exhaustion and was shown effective in EMGTh testing of adults. Determine whether an IICT protocol would enhance EMGTh detection in children, and consequently increase the magnitude of the previously observed child-adult EMGTh differences. 18 boys and 21 men completed one-repetition-maximum (1RM) isometric knee-extension test. The IICT protocol followed, commencing at 25%1RM and comprising five isometric contractions per load, incremented by ~ 3%1RM to exhaustion. Vastus lateralis surface EMG was recorded and EMGTh, expressed as %1RM, was defined as the onset of the EMG-response's steeper segment. EMGTh was detected in 88.9% of boys and 95.2% of men, and occurred at higher relative intensities in boys (56.4 ± 9.2%1RM) than in men (46.0 ± 6.8%1RM). This 10.4% difference was 57% greater than the corresponding, previously reported cycling-based age-related difference. With the boys' detection rate nearly on par with the men's, the IICT protocol appears to overcome much of the intensity limitation of cycling-based protocols and provide a more sensitive EMGTh detection tool, thus extending the previously observed boys‒men difference. This difference adds supports to the notion of children's more limited type-II MU recruitment capacity.