Isomer-Specific Solvatochromic and Molecular Rotor Properties of ESIPT-Active Push-Pull Fluorescent Chalcone Dyes.

Abstract

Aromatic chromophores possessing intramolecular hydrogen-bonds that can undergo excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) are critical tools for chemosensing/biosensing applications because they create large Stokes-shifted fluorescence with no overlap with the absorption spectrum to limit back-ground interferences. Classic ESIPT-active fluorophores, such as the 2-(2'-hydroxyphenyl) benzazole (HBX) series (X = NH, O, S), favor a ground-state (GS) enol (E) form that undergoes ESIPT to afford an excited-state (ES) keto (K) tautomer that generates red-shifted fluorescence. Herein, we have attached the HBX moiety to 6-methoxy-indanone (6MI) to create isomeric (ortho and para) ESIPT-active chalcone dyes and have characterized their photophysical properties in polar protic solvents (MeOH and glycerol (Gly)/MeOH mixtures) and a nonpolar aprotic (1,4-dioxane) solvent for comparison. The chalcones favor a GS E structure, which undergoes ESIPT in MeOH, Gly/MeOH mixtures, and dioxane to exclusively afford K emission with large Stokes shifts. The o-isomers possess expanded π-conjugation compared to their p-isomer counterparts, which diminishes their tendency to generate twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) states. Consequently, the o-isomers have greater quantum yields and lack molecular rotor (MR) character with little K emission response to increased solvent viscosity. However, they possess strong positive solvatochromism, displaying significant blue wavelength shifts coupled with turn-on K emission in moving from polar protic MeOH to nonpolar dioxane. In contrast, the p-isomers display MR character with turn-on K emission in 75:25 Gly/MeOH compared to their emission in MeOH (up to 14-fold) due to a strong tendency for TICT. Mechanistic insight into the observed isomer-specific photophysical properties of the ESIPT-active chalcones was obtained through density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Implications for DNA biosensing applications are discussed.