Abstract
We have studied the proximity-induced superconducting triplet pairing in CoO$_x$/Py1/Cu/Py2/Cu/Pb spin-valve structure (where Py = Ni$_{0.81}$Fe$_{0.19}$). By optimizing the parameters of this structure we found a triplet channel assisted full switching between the normal and superconducting states. To observe an "isolated" triplet spin-valve effect we exploited the oscillatory feature of the magnitude of the ordinary spin-valve effect $\Delta T_c$ in the dependence of the Py2-layer thickness $d_{Py2}$. We determined the value of $d_{Py2}$ at which $\Delta T_c$ caused by the ordinary spin-valve effect (the difference in the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ between the antiparallel and parallel mutual orientation of magnetizations of the Py1 and Py2 layers) is suppressed. For such a sample a "pure" triplet spin-valve effect which causes the minimum in $T_c$ at the orthogonal configuration of magnetizations has been observed.
Highlights
We analyzed the dependence of the superconducting transition temperature Tc on the angle α between the magnetizations of the Py1 and Py2 ferromagnetic layers in the magnetic field H0 = +100 Oe applied in the plane of the sample
This difference in magnitude of the spin-valve effect ∆Tc is associated with the fact that, for the thickness of the permalloy layer dPy2 = 3 nm in sample 2, the wave function of superconductor Cooper pairs almost completely decays in the Py2 ferromagnetic layer
Py1 has little influence on the superconductivity and, on the magnitude of the superconducting spinvalve effect ∆Tc. This is consistent with the fact that, in accordance with the theory, a decrease in the thickness of the permalloy layer dPy2 leads to an increase in the superconducting spin-valve effect ∆Tc
Summary
The optimal thickness of the Pb layer dPb = 70 nm was determined from the Tc(dPb) curve measured at a constant dPy1 = 5 nm, which is much larger than the penetration depth ξh of Cooper pairs into ferromagnetic Py. Basing on our data on Tc(dPy) at fixed dPb we estimate this value as ξh∼1.1 nm. Earlier we revealed that the F1-layer thickness at a fixed dF2 does not significantly influence ∆Tc for the sample set CoOx(2.5 nm)/Fe1(dFe1)/Cu(4 nm)/Fe2(dFe2)/Cu(1.2 nm)/Pb(60 nm) and that a thin Cu(1.2 nm) interlayer between F2- and S- layers is completely transparent for the Cooper pairs [17]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
