Isolated OPCABG in moderate chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: is it a justifiable alternative approach ?

Abstract

Current evidence does not allow a consensus on the management of moderate chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (CIMR). We compared moderate CIMR patients undergoing off-pump CABG (OPCABG) alone and CABG + MV repair for early mortality, major adverse systemic events (MASE) and mid-term functional outcomes. 210 patients with moderate CIMR who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) Group I (n = 106) or CABG + mitral valve repair (MV rep) Group II (n = 104) were followed prospectively. For comparison, patients were further sub-divided based on the product of regurgitant fraction and ejection fraction "RFEF"(Good/Bad) and MR jet direction (Central/Eccentric). The primary end point of the study was mortality and secondary end points were MASE, percentage improvements in indexed left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESVI %), MR grade and functional outcomes of the patients. In-hospital and overall mortality was significantly lower in Group I (1.89% vs. 13.46%, p < 0.001 and 5.66% vs. 15.38%; p = 0.024 respectively). Group II had significantly higher MASE, ventilation time, mean ICU and hospital stay. At 36months, LVESVI% (17.56% ± 9.12% vs. 18.81% ± 7.48%; p = 0.279), MR grade improvement (80.18% vs. 83.50%; p = 0.544), NYHA class and MLHF scores were also similar in both groups. On subgroup analysis, Good RFEF with Central jet subgroup had comparable improvement in LVESVI% and MR grade with either procedure, while Bad Eccentric subgroup showed a significantly higher improvement in LVESVI% and MR grade with CABG + MV repair. OPCABG is associated with significantly reduced mortality and MASE with comparable improvement in LVEDVI% and MR grade. CABG + MV Rep results in significant improvement in LVEDVI% and MR grade in patients with bad eccentric MR. The recommended procedures in the "Good Central" and "Bad Eccentric" subsets are CABG and CABG + Mvrepair, respectively.