Abstract
To investigate if patients younger than 50years old had improved functional outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis (BT) for the treatment of biceps reflection pulley (BRP) lesions at minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up. Patients who had arthroscopically confirmed BRP tears that were treated with subpectoral BT and were at least 2years out from surgery were included; patients were excluded if they had concomitant reconstructive or reparative procedures at index surgery. Patient-centered outcomes including return to activity, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS) scores, and patient satisfaction were collected. The pre- and postoperative scores were compared with a Wilcoxon test. Failure was defined as revision BT. Between January 2006 and July 2014, of 1,184 patients who underwent open subpectoral BT, 14 patients (6 male, 8 female) with mean age 37 (range, 16-49years) met the inclusion criteria. Minimum 2-year outcomes data were available for all 14 patients (100% follow-up). The mean follow-up was 3.6 ± 1.3years. There were significant improvements postoperatively for all outcome scores (P= .017 ASES, P= .002 QuickDASH, P= .003 SF-12 PCS). There was no correlation between age and outcome scores (P > .05). Median patient satisfaction was 9 of 10. Five patients (36%) reported return to recreational activity with no modifications; 9 (64%) indicated a return to activity with modifications. The 5 patients who returned to recreational activity with no modification had significantly less time from initial injury/onset of symptoms until surgery in comparison with the 9 patients who modified their activity (P=.028). No complications or reoperations were reported. Patients younger than 50years old with a symptomatic isolated BRP lesion experienced excellent results, high return to recreational activity, little postoperative pain, and high degrees of satisfaction when treated with subpectoral BT. Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.